Find the Videos, Producers, & Vloggers You Want Faster
Aldous Huxley renowned futurist, eugenicist, and author of "Brave New World" and many other books, gave a now infamous speech at UC Berkley in 1962 titled: The Ultimate Revolution. (click ''more'')
In his presentation, Aldous Huxley gave historical evidence, and future predictions on how the "New World Order" would be achieved by the ruling Oligarchy via their use of State Sponsored Terrorism to implement their desired Lock Step Police State to control the proletariat by the fear of ever increasing terrorism as a pretext to the citizens of Western Society willingly sacrificing their essential freedoms and liberties for the promise of temporary security.
The first 45 minutes is the lecture, the next 35 minutes are questions from the public and reporters.
I have separated both parts with a different picture of the great Aldous Huxley.
Researchers at the University of Warwick have found that fake video evidence can dramatically alter people's perceptions of events, even convincing them to testify as an eyewitness to an event that never happened.
Associate Professor Dr Kimberley Wade from the Department of Psychology led an experiment to see whether exposure to fabricated footage of an event could induce individuals to accuse another person of doing something they never did.
In the study, published in Applied Cognitive Psychology, Dr Wade found that almost 50% of people shown fake footage of an event they witnessed first hand were prepared to believe the video version rather than what they actually saw.
Dr Wade's research team filmed 60 subjects as they took part in a computerised gambling task. The subjects were unknowingly seated next to a member of the research team as they both separately answered a series of multiple-choice general knowledge questions.
All subjects were given a pile of fake money to gamble with and they shared a pile of money that represented the bank. Their task was to earn as much money as possible by typing in an amount of money to gamble on the chances of them answering each question correctly. They were told the person who made the highest profit would win a prize.
When they answered each question, subjects saw either a green tick on their computer monitor to show their answer was correct, or a red cross to show it was incorrect. If the answer was wrong, they would be told to return the money to the bank.
After the session, the video footage was doctored to make it look as if the member of the research team sat next to the subject was cheating by not putting money back into the bank.
One third of the subjects were told that the person sat next to them was suspected of cheating. Another third were told the person had been caught on camera cheating, and the remaining group were actually shown the fake video footage. All subjects were then asked to sign a statement only if they had seen the cheating take place.
Nearly 40% of the participants who had seen the doctored video complied. Another 10% of the group signed when asked a second time by the researchers. Only 10% of those who were told the incident had been caught on film but were not shown the video agreed to sign, and about 5% of the control group who were just told about the cheating signed the statement.
Dr Wade said: "Over the previous decade we have seen rapid advances in digital-manipulation technology. As a result, almost anyone can create convincing, yet fake, images or video footage. Our research shows that if fake footage is extremely compelling, it can induce people to testify about something they never witnessed."
MUCH MORE info here:
9/11 Synchronized Shared Media
some videos from: https://youtube.com/user/11September2009
These are the first 11 minutes of the September 11, 2001 LIVE TV BROADCASTS.
The five major US TV networks (ABC, CBS, FOX, NBS and CNN) are synchronized - visually - using cues from apparent, shared 'satellite feeds' seen in the various broadcasts. In spite of this, several inexplicable synch offsets occur randomly - at various times of the broadcasts. A host of aberrations suggest that these 'LIVE broadcasts' simply cannot be real: artificial, saturated, monochromatic color schemes; unrealistic camera motions; numerous/aimless chopper fly-bys; one single, surreal bird-flock fly-by, etc. One must wonder what those many 'choppers' are up to in the first place: most simply fly across the screen at sustained speed. Some are synched (between the networks), while some are not - or altogether missing. All of this suggests these images are merely a pre-fabricated batch of computer simulations designed to fool the world.
Keep in mind that these broadcasts should represent the immediate aftermath of a most unexpected event (the 1st "hijacked plane's" strike at 8;46AM). Yet, the 5 rival TV networks appear to be instantly interconnected -- often sharing identical images in real-time, as if all were actually mixed in a single TV studio. A series of other oddities occur in these crucial minutes of the day's 'newscasts. I have chosen to point out only a few significant ones -- leaving the opportunity for anyone to pick out the rest. Test your observation skills !
What best reveals the contrived nature of these proffered "LIVE" broadcasts is the absurd sequence of the "FINAL 16 SECONDS OF PLANE APPROACH": four shots depict the approach sequentially - yet none of the 4 shots timelines overlap. It ensues that there are no two directly comparable LIVE SHOTS within the "airplane approach" timeline. This is - objectively speaking - way beyond the realm of probability; To put such an occurrence down to haphazard demands a formidable 'leap of faith'. (To be sure, the official tale of 9/11 presents an endless procession of extraordinary 'coincidences'). More likely, this occurrence was no fluke : disallowing any comparison/cross-examination of the 4 "airplane shots" would have been an obvious 'safety measure' observed by the computer-animation crew.
MUCH MORE info here:
video from: http://youtube.com/user/simonshack
Explaining the government led PSYOP that pass off as "false clues" disguised as truth to trick people on how they did 9/11....
The main psy-ops is to make top government officials deliberately make so called "slip ups" that conspirasists latch on to and use as evidence....
But these "slip ups'" are done on purpose to lead you away from the REAL truth....
- 1st Part : Expose the Freudian Slip of Rumsfeld, the supposed "shot down" of Flight 93 over Shanksville, Pennsylvania, the fake hole and 8 miles debris crash.
- 2nd Part - Expose the "plane" repetition for mind-control purpose, Dick Cheney's "Stand Down" Order on 9/11, and the Pentagon "Plane".
- 3rd Part - Expose the fake "pod theory" use by "truthers" as "proof", the US dollar bill drawings of the Towers and Pentagon burning.
Watch the main movie: 'September Clues" here.
Clues Forum: http://cluesforum.info
An analysis of the television footage of the "planes" hitting the World Trade Center Towers aired on September 11th, 2001.
Television is - and has always been - a Weapon of Mass Distraction.
The power of TV-imagery was the driving force behind the 9/11 deception.
Whenever a major news event is reported by the mainstream media, it will invariably be illustrated with photographs or videos in order to convey to the public some visual impressions of the event. Undeniably, the imagery connected with any given news story enhances our emotional relation to it. The way we relate to news imagery has an almost hypnotic effect on our psyche: we have come to consider the visuals of any given news story as proof of that news story's authenticity. This is truly a 'weak spot' of our brains' readiness for critical-thinking. Thus follows, unfortunately, that to challenge the authenticity of a catastrophic event shown on Live TV is way beyond what most people are willing to contemplate. However, the time has come for everyone to call television by its most appropriate, military-sounding name: "Weapon of Mass Distraction".
The 9/11 psyop relied foremostly on that 'weak spot' of ours. We all fell for the images we saw on TV at the time -- understandably so, as the sheer horror of the proposed imagery generated a wall of outrage and fear -- thick enough to discourage any critical review of it. In hindsight, we can only wonder why so few questioned the absurd TV coverage proposed by all the major networks.
WHAT TELEVISION VIEWERS SAW ON 9/11
The 9/11 TV imagery (of the crucial morning events) was just a computer-animated, pre-fabricated movie. It featured for the most part what were meant to be "chopper shots" of the smoking towers - and very little else. The sum total of "Action Shots" ("Planecrash" and "Tower collapses") amounted to little over 30secs of the entire morning's TV broadcasts ! Needless to say, much as the rest of the animation movie, none of these "Action Shots" depicted any sort of reality. Now, it may be difficult for many to understand why the 9/11 plotters needed to fake even the tower collapses; yet this was undoubtedly the most crucial aspect of the entire operation - and needs to be fully understood in its plain logic: The unprecedented WTC demolition job was far too risky an affair to be shown on LIVE TV - (or to let any amateur cameraman capture it on film). The 9/11 conspirators had no intention whatsoever to offer such a "pyrotechnical" spectacle to world scrutiny - just imagine how unspeakably foolish this would have been. Thus, in all probability, the oldest trick in the manuals of covert military ops was used: smokescreens. More recent technology deactivated temporarily all cameras within sight of the area. In reality, the towers were most likely enveloped in thick smoke (military obscurants) as they collapsed - and no real footage exists of that brief event. Thankfully - for all normal people of this world - the 9/11 planners hired a poorly skilled animation crew : in their efforts to simulate reality, their crass 'artistry' and countless mistakes provide ample and repeatable proof of the trickery - forever engraved in the TV archives.
WHY FAKE THE NEWS BROADCASTS ?
The 9/11 TV broadcasts were designed to 'sell' a fictitious terror attack to the world-- by replacing the real-life events of the day (the WTC demolitions) with fake imagery. The official story was quite surreal - as were the TV images of the day and the preposterous tale of 19 kids roundly outfoxing the US Air Defense. It is essential to judge with one's own eyes the broadcasts actually aired by ABC, CBS, FOX, NBC and CNN.
WHAT ABOUT THE "AMATEUR" VIDEOS ?
All the other videos (endlessly replayed on TV) were released only later. They have all been extensively analyzed by scores of video analysts; each and every video snippet of "amateur imagery" has been methodically dissected and compared - and empirically proved to be nothing else than computer-generated fabrications.
For MUCH MORE info, here.
9/11 Archives videos.
The FBI claims they recovered 95% of Flight 93 at Shanksville. ROFL!
video from: https://youtube.com/user/WelcomeToKilltown
Please, fasten your seat-belt.
Debunking the 9/11 hijacking myths!
An insight into the massive propaganda efforts deployed to sell the 9/11 hoax to the world. The complicit mainstream media corporations played a central role in staging this psyop - and have to be held accountable for it. What was aired on TV on the morning of 9/11 was nothing but a prefabricated "Hollywood movie" for public consumption. Before watching this episode, I recommend viewing my full September Clues research documentary: http://septemberclues.info
ABOUT "911 PROPAGANDA":
This episode of my longstanding 9/11 research analyzes one of the many propaganda movies ("9/11 Hotel") manufactured over the years to perpetuate this wretched hoax played upon mankind. "911 PROPAGANDA" aims to demonstrate how a wide range of 3d-rate actors have been employed to impersonate alleged "authentic survivors and victims' family members". This was of course necessary in order to uphold the crucial notion that "3000 persons were killed by Binladen" that day. Extensive research has determined that the WTC towers were most likely completely empty as they were demolished with controlled explosives. To kill 3000 people in the process never was an envisaged proposition - for a number of reasons dictated by logic and common sense. (And no, this aspect does not whitewash the real perps of 9/11 of their crimes against humanity - and the ensuing, murderous wars in the Middle East and elsewhere).
For more info about just how these approx 3000 identities were digitally simulated, please go to:
If my own research falls short of convincing you that 3000 people did NOT die on 9/11 (I don't blame you, it's a LOT to take in!) - you may want to check out this must-read article published, astonishingly enough, in the mainstream news media :
"WHY ARE THE NEARLY 3000 VICTIMS MISSING FROM AN OFFICIAL FEDERAL DEATH REGISTRY?"
This ABC article, published over 10 years after the fact, may well be the most truthful and revealing piece of 9/11 information ever released by the mainstream media.
On the other hand, this other MSM article (related to some personages featured in this episode) is also a must read - for different reasons: It is a prime example of the countless 'heart-wrenching' 9/11 trash-tales made up to sell the notion that the WTC was populated with lots of people - who purportedly accomplished various heroic deeds:
"HE THOUGHT HE WAS THE LUCKY ONE..."
A question for all : Have you ever read this much crap in a newspaper article in your entire life ? If you do your own research, you will find that just about every single article spinning the tales of alleged 9/11 victims and/ or survivors offers the same sort of unmitigated tripe.
video from: http://youtube.com/user/simonshack
Our latest research in 2009 has brought us to a series of remarkable discoveries in the collection of victim stories. What began as an insightful look at the CNN.com 9/11 Victim Memorial, the original source of the death reports, turned into realization after realization that the entire body of victims - from the airplanes, to the Pentagon, to the World Trade Center - had all been created at the same time by an "identity generating" software program which creates 'digital' people with (oft improbable) fictitious names. Anyone armed with a little patience and a discerning attitude should be able to realize that the "CNN Victim Memorial" is a preposterous list of counterfeit identities. As a result, the full extent of the 9/11 simulation - heroes, victims and villains - is revealed as the absurd, fabricated drama that it is.
For A LOT more info, read the "Vicsim Report" and "Memorial Scams" here.
and this forum:
video from: http://youtube.com/user/11September2009
Crash Physics 101 concerning 9/11.
On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.
The forensic analysis of the LIVE TV images leaves no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.
The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites - yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitry) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. In fact, several electronic disruptions occurred in NYC on the day : scores of testimonies reported jammed cellphones and, notoriously, the breakdown of the NYFD firefighters' radio communications was a cause of great concern and outrage. The WTC towers' internal communication system was also inexplicably blacked out.
Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort - not a large 'passenger airliner'. Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible. The inescapable fact is that the television images of 9/11 did not depict the real events of that fateful day. The mainstream media's involvement on 9/11 is the unspeakable truth of our times.
ABOUT EMP/HERF(or HPM) electromagnetic weaponry :
There can be no denying that the development of EMP/HERF technology has been a strategic military priority over the last decades. One of the main features of EMP/HERF weapons is their ability to disrupt - selectively - the enemy's electronic systems. In this video, I contend / postulate that this technology was likely used to disrupt temporarily videocamera circuitries in the Manhattan area. It has been counter-argued that this would have caused all sorts of disruptions in other electronic appliances. Not necessarily so : the disruptive frequencies can be selectively calibrated to affect a specific range of devices. An EMP/HERF diffuser might have been placed, say, on top of WTC7 and tested well beforehand. Nevertheless - and interestingly - we know that lenghty cellphone blackouts occured on the day and that firefighters' radio-transmitters also malfunctioned : one could reasonably speculate this was due to some 'bleeding' of the EMP/HERF jamming-beams , thus affecting similar HZ-range electronics.
Theoretically, a total videocamera jamming/blackout was only needed for a few, crucial seconds of the day (tower strikes+tower collapses). Nevertheless, it seems likely it was applied throughout the 102 minutes of the morning events (+ in the afternoon at the time of the WTC7 collapse ) to prevent any private footage to record the events as they unfolded IN REALITY.
In any event, it should be clear that the various videos betray irreconcilable discrepancies. It is up to everyone's logic to make sense out of the imagery we were fed on 9/11by the major TV networks. With the available evidence now at hand, the most reasonable conclusion is that most - if not all - of the 9/11 TV 'newscasts' were but a series of pre-fabricated, digital fabrications.
MUCH MORE info here: http://cluesforum.info/
The military talked about using TV fakery since 1995. Digitally altering live TV broadcasts has been feasible since 1998. Since 2000, the media has been warning the public about the news and military using TV fakery.
ALL THE ARTICLES IN THE VIDEO.
When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing
1st & Ten (graphics system)
When TV brings you the news as it didn't happen
Lying with Pixels
Army PSYOP at CNN
MUCH MORE information here: http://cluesforum.info/
video from: https://youtube.com/WelcomeToKilltown
The Media is not just biased, it is completely fabricating events. They are one big production company charged with managing your perception of the world using CGI, Photoshop, actors, and scripted events. These are all staged Psyops. The alternative "truth" media is controlled opposition meant to keep you scared and confused. Stop buying into any of it.
Watch "September Clues"
And much more information on Media Fakery here.
videos from: https://youtube.com/user/LifePsyop